A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out involving future neighbours over the construction of a wall in a coastal web page within a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes captivated national consideration next an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed spouse and children house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental concerns, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Periods posting about René Collier and the Irish Occasions write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved right into a highly publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development will work at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, find to create their loved ones residence. The case happens to be emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, the place growth pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of set up residents. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being manufactured by their possible neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted under scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Road, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their scheduling permission by developing a wall past the boundaries in their website, resulting in an encroachment on a Specific Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such regions are subject to rigid controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have lasting ecological implications, particularly in a very sensitive coastal setting such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach in their scheduling authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partly created, is in the correct place. Their legal crew has characterised the motion as an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their look at, an allegation that's been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, where sights of The ocean are both equally remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular attempts through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site, according to sworn proof referenced from the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded via midsection-significant drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Occasions, a picture which has because become emblematic of your intensity of the dispute. These steps were not just symbolic; they had been meant to Get Visible evidence of the wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Moments noted, describing how The 2 men entered the drinking water during significant climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm h2o to photograph the website grew to become Probably the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Instances posting about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these steps were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was staying encroached on.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined intimately via the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as audience sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard additional submissions on no matter if interim orders need to be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital instant during the lawful timeline.
For the Main on the dispute can be a disagreement above boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain that the wall, as manufactured, goes outside of what was accredited and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his examination of scheduling paperwork, maps, and situations hooked up to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their motion is determined by concern for environmental defense and adherence to organizing regulation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public view, insisting in its place that it is about making sure that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they have described their long-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple basically trying to make a family residence in accordance with the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches with a Unique Spot of Conservation and say that every one functions have already been completed dependant on Expert tips and authorised ideas. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, like coming into the sea for the duration of a storm, will not alter the fundamental specifics.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how organizing disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute about development of wall at coastal web-site happens to be a shorthand description for just a problem that numerous observers see as increasingly common. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Occasions posting about René Collier observed the businessman experienced Earlier been involved in local advocacy on scheduling and environmental troubles, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people Rene Collier and Paul Feely today from quite distinct professional backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Occasions protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waist-large h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances and René Collier waded by midsection-higher drinking water all through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both of those the physical reality in the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive method.
Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result remains uncertain. The court must determine whether the wall as built complies with planning authorization and whether or not any encroachment into a Special Area of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and planning circumstances. However the human element continues to be central: neighbours who have to Dwell alongside each other extended following the legal costs are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than construction will work at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case increase over and above that address. For planners, developers, and residents alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. Additionally, it underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when essential concerns which include environmental protection and assets rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains an area of natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre in the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. Whether or not it can ultimately be altered, eliminated, or accomplished as planned will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will very likely continue on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to Just about the most intently watched planning disputes in north Dublin lately.